Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Unilateral refusal to supply: An agreement in disguise?

In English

Författare

Summary, in English

From a company perspective it is easier to develop a marketing strategy within a company than to arrange it in collaboration with others. Internal affairs can be controlled but agreements are left to the discretion of authorities. European competition policy suffers from a system failure discriminating against vertical agreements in favor of integrated organizations. Non-dominant companies should in principle be allowed to unilaterally decide its business strategy as there are alternatives. It is also important to distinguish the unilateral activity from collaboration. This article reviews the Bayer Adalat case and discusses and the border-line question – collaboration or unilateral activity.

Publiceringsår

1997

Språk

Engelska

Sidor

352-360

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

European Competition Law Review

Volym

18

Dokumenttyp

Artikel i tidskrift

Förlag

Sweet & Maxwell

Ämne

  • Law

Nyckelord

  • EU Competition law
  • competition law
  • Unilateral restrictions
  • contract law
  • agreements in disguise
  • Adalat case.

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 0144-3054