Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Determination of hexahydrophthalic anhydride in air using gas chromatography

In English

Författare

  • Bo A Jönsson
  • Hans Welinder
  • Gunnar Skarping

Summary, in English

Two methods for the determination of hexahydrophthalic anhydride (HHPA) in air were developed. In a solid sorbent method, HHPA was sampled in Amberlite XAD-2 tubes, eluted in toluene and analysed by gas chromatography with flame ionization detection. The sampling rates were 0.2 and 1.0 l/min. At 15 micrograms/m3 (relative humidity less than 2%) and 27 micrograms/m3 (relative humidity 70%) no breakthrough was observed. However, at 160 micrograms/m3 (relative humidity less than 2%), 6% breakthrough was found. The sampling efficiency of the sampling rates 0.2 and 1.0 l/min did not differ. In a bubbler method, HHPA was sampled in bubblers filled with 0.1 M sodium hydroxide solution. The sodium salt of hexahydrophthalic acid was formed. No breakthrough was observed using a sampling rate of 1.0 l/min. The samples were stable during storage for eight weeks in a refrigerator. The HHP acid was esterified with methanol-boron trifluoride and analysed by gas chromatography-flame ionization detection. Apparatus for the generation of standard atmospheres of HHPA, in the range of 10-3000 micrograms/m3, was developed using the diffusion principle. For the solid sorbent method the precision (coefficient of variation) of the overall method was 2-7%, and for the bubbler method 3-19% (range 15-160 micrograms HHPA/m3; relative humidity = less than 2-70%). A comparison between the two methods was performed using the standard atmosphere. The concentrations found by the solid sorbent method were 86-98% of those found by the bubbler method (range 15-160 micrograms HHPA per m3; relative humidity = less than 2-70%). In work environment air, 93% was found using the solid sorbent method relative to the bubbler method at a mean concentration of 330 micrograms/m3 (coefficient of variation = 39%; range 200-540 micrograms/m3). For both methods, concentrations greater than 3 micrograms/m3 could be quantified at 60 min sampling with a sampling rate of 1.0 l/min.

Publiceringsår

1991

Språk

Engelska

Sidor

247-256

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

Journal of Chromatography A

Volym

558

Issue

1

Dokumenttyp

Artikel i tidskrift

Förlag

Elsevier

Ämne

  • Environmental Health and Occupational Health

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 0021-9673