Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Questions of Method in James Dunn's Jesus Remembered

Författare

Summary, in English

Parts of Dunn's methodology in "Jesus Remembered" (2003) are scrutinised: the meaning of "memory" and whether this is the ultimately attainable object of historiography. I contend that historical research should not content itself with investigating how memories are "fictionalized", i.e. retained in narrative form, but press on to verified judgments on historical facts. "Grand (or: master) narratives", i.e. large-scale, holistic frameworks for the interpretation of data are - critically used - more important for historical work than Dunn wants to admit.



This is the final, accepted and revised manuscript of this article. Use alternative location to go to the published article. Requires subscription.

Avdelning/ar

Publiceringsår

2004

Språk

Engelska

Sidor

445-457

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

Journal for the Study of the New Testament

Volym

26

Issue

4

Dokumenttyp

Artikel i tidskrift

Förlag

SAGE Publications

Ämne

  • Religious Studies

Nyckelord

  • Jesus research
  • memory
  • oral tradition
  • fictionalization or refiguration of memories
  • grand narratives
  • historical fact
  • master narrative
  • critical realism
  • meaning of "history"

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 0142-064X