Anaphoric pronouns of metonymic expressions
Författare
Summary, in English
One peculiarity of referential metonymy is that metonymic subjects and their predicates need not agree as to
number. Nor need there be gender agreement between metonymic expressions and anaphoric pronouns. In this
respect metonymies differ from metaphors.To account for the apparently erratic syntax in utterances containing
referential metonymies, it is first suggested that these involve implicit extensions which together with the
explicit metonymic element form referential units. This suggests that metaphorical and metonymic mapping
processes are fundamentally different. The focus of the paper is next the question of what determines choice of
anaphoric pronouns. It is argued that what is perceived to be topic is an important factor.
number. Nor need there be gender agreement between metonymic expressions and anaphoric pronouns. In this
respect metonymies differ from metaphors.To account for the apparently erratic syntax in utterances containing
referential metonymies, it is first suggested that these involve implicit extensions which together with the
explicit metonymic element form referential units. This suggests that metaphorical and metonymic mapping
processes are fundamentally different. The focus of the paper is next the question of what determines choice of
anaphoric pronouns. It is argued that what is perceived to be topic is an important factor.
Avdelning/ar
Publiceringsår
2004
Språk
Engelska
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie
metaphorik.de
Volym
7
Dokumenttyp
Artikel i tidskrift
Ämne
- Languages and Literature
Status
Published
ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt
- ISSN: 1618-2006