Meny

Javascript verkar inte påslaget? - Vissa delar av Lunds universitets webbplats fungerar inte optimalt utan javascript, kontrollera din webbläsares inställningar.
Du är här

Learning Objects and their implications on Learning: a case of developing the foundation for a new Knowledge Infrastructure

Författare:
Redaktör:
  • Keith Harman
  • Alex Koohang
Publiceringsår: 2007
Språk: Engelska
Sidor: 157-185
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie: Learning Objects: Applications, Implications & Future Directions
Dokumenttyp: Del av eller Kapitel i bok
Förlag: Informing Science Press

Sammanfattning

In an era of lifelong learning, empowerment of the learner becomes fundamental. Therefore ex-ploitation of the full potential of learning objects depends upon creation of an appropriate infra-structure to promote symmetrical control of inquiry. The learner needs to be empowered because learning is a discovery process and thus must be under his or her own control.

In early stages of education it is often assumed that choice of material is to be decided by ex-perts. At the more advanced stages, however, any subject problem space becomes more complex, and thus any decision related to relevance of inquiry properly rests with the learner. However without access to relevant contextual material (in addition to content) the learner will not be in a position to make responsible judgments.

Two problems are to be adduced. First, current attempts to contextualize content, such as those based on the use of metadata etc, have been shown to be insufficient. Secondly, current devel-opments in infrastructure assume that access and control of inquiry rest with the provider and fail to accommodate support of symmetrical dialogue.

Many strategies for the use of Learning Objects assume that a learner wishes to be led through the material and precludes the possibility of an educational experience which promotes critical thinking (such as that inspired by Socratic Method). We would argue that an infrastructure is needed which is capable of supporting both types of learning practice.

It could be argued that thinking cannot be taught and that the only thing we can hope to achieve in education is mentoring and guidance within a problem space. A number of substantial research projects have been conducted in recent years in partnership between a range of significant European industrial actors and academic institutions. We will draw upon the findings of these projects, in conjunction with contemporary research into individual requirements shaping, in or-der to suggest a model for developing an infrastructure. This model will allow the possibility for symmetrical control of inquiry between learner and provider of learning objects.

Disputation

Nyckelord

  • Business and Economics
  • Social Sciences
  • Technology and Engineering
  • RENAISSANCE
  • EASEL
  • GESTALT
  • GUARDIANS
  • MRU
  • SST
  • Strategic Systemic Thinking
  • Future Infrastructure
  • Web 3
  • Systems Analysis
  • Contextual Analysis
  • Learning Objects
  • Knowledge Infrastructure

Övriga

Published
Yes
  • ISBN: 83-922337-8-6

Box 117, 221 00 LUND
Telefon 046-222 00 00 (växel)
Telefax 046-222 47 20
lu [at] lu [dot] se

Fakturaadress: Box 188, 221 00 LUND
Organisationsnummer: 202100-3211
Om webbplatsen