Du är här

“Challenges to Legitimacy in Food Safety Governance? The Case of the European Food Safety Authority”

Publiceringsår: 2010
Språk: Engelska
Sidor: 309-327
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie: Journal of European Integration
Volym: 32
Nummer: 3
Dokumenttyp: Artikel

Sammanfattning

The ‘old’ forms of governance have been criticised for being neither sufficiently democratic nor effective. The popularity of ‘new’ modes of governance includes the embracing of values – integral to democratic processes – such as legitimacy, public accountability and trust. By relating parts of this ‘old-vs.-new’ distinction to March & Olsen’s dichotomy of aggregative vs.
integrative political processes, the aim of this paper is to find patterns for how such processes are combined in European food safety governance. The paper focuses on the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). What forms of participation can be found in ‘new’ food safety governance? How are these forms of participation related to the aims of increasing the legitimacy? The article discusses challenges involved in EFSA’s mixing of integrative goals and the organisation’s view of food safety politics, in which aggregative policy processes are conceived as a rough ‘natural state’ which should be tamed.

Disputation

Nyckelord

  • Social Sciences
  • Law and Political Science
  • food governance
  • deliberative democracy
  • food safety
  • European harmonisation

Övriga

  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • FORMAS
Published
Yes
  • Miljöpolitik

Box 117, 221 00 LUND
Telefon 046-222 00 00 (växel)
Telefax 046-222 47 20
lu [at] lu [dot] se

Fakturaadress: Box 188, 221 00 LUND
Organisationsnummer: 202100-3211
Om webbplatsen