Locke and the Non-arbitrary
Författare
Summary, in English
In this article, John Locke's accounts of political liberty and legitimate government are read as expressions of a normative demand for non-arbitrariness. I argue that Locke locates infringements of political liberty in dependence on the arbitrary will of another, whether or not interference or restraint actually takes place. This way Locke is tentatively placed in that tradition of republican thought recently brought to our attention by Pettit, Skinner and others. This reading shifts the focus on legitimacy and identifies the independent moral argument for legitimate government as ruling for the good of the people. Consent is left with a hypothetical role to play.
Avdelning/ar
Publiceringsår
2003
Språk
Engelska
Sidor
261-279
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie
European Journal of Political Theory
Volym
2
Issue
3
Dokumenttyp
Artikel i tidskrift
Förlag
SAGE Publications
Ämne
- Philosophy
Nyckelord
- dependence
- government
- hypothetical consent
- legitimacy
- liberty
- Locke
- non-arbitrariness
- public good
- republicanism
- trust
Status
Published
ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt
- ISSN: 1741-2730