Meny

Javascript is not activated in your browser. This website needs javascript activated to work properly.
Du är här

Ways of constructing research questions: gap-spotting or problematization?

Författare:
Publiceringsår: 2011
Språk: Engelska
Sidor: 23-44
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie: Organization
Volym: 18
Nummer: 1
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Förlag: Sage publications

Sammanfattning

This article examines ways of constructing research questions from existing literature, which are likely to promote the development of interesting and influential theories. We review 52 articles in organization studies and develop a typology of how researchers construct their research questions from existing literature. The most common way across paradigmatic camps is to spot various 'gaps' in the literature and, based on that, to formulate specific research questions. The dominance of gap-spotting is surprising, given it is increasingly recognized that theory is made interesting and influential when it challenges assumptions that underlie existing literature. The article discusses why assumption-challenging approaches are rare, and it identifies a range of social norms that favour gap-spotting. Finally, the article proposes some ways of constructing research questions that move beyond gap-spotting, and discusses how these ways are likely to promote more interesting and significant theories.

Disputation

Nyckelord

  • Business and Economics
  • interesting theories
  • problematization
  • research methods
  • research
  • problems
  • research questions
  • theory development

Övriga

Published
Yes
  • ISSN: 1350-5084

Box 117, 221 00 LUND
Telefon 046-222 00 00 (växel)
Telefax 046-222 47 20
lu [at] lu [dot] se

Fakturaadress: Box 188, 221 00 LUND
Organisationsnummer: 202100-3211
Om webbplatsen