Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Empirical Fallacies in the Debate on Substituted Judgment.

In English

Författare

Summary, in English

According to the Substituted Judgment Standard a surrogate decision maker ought to make the decision that the incompetent patient would have made, had he or she been competent. This standard has received a fair amount of criticism, but the objections raised are often wide of the mark. In this article we discuss three objections based on empirical research, and explain why these do not give us reason to abandon the Substituted Judgment Standard.

Avdelning/ar

Publiceringsår

2014

Språk

Engelska

Sidor

73-81

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

Health Care Analysis

Volym

22

Issue

1

Dokumenttyp

Artikel i tidskrift

Förlag

Springer

Ämne

  • Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Nyckelord

  • * Incompetence * Substituted Judgment Standard * Proxy decision making

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 1573-3394