Meny

Javascript is not activated in your browser. This website needs javascript activated to work properly.
Du är här

Revisiting 'Weinberg's Choice': Classic Tensions in the Concept of Scientific Merit

Publiceringsår: 2012
Språk: Engelska
Sidor: 381-396
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie: Minerva
Volym: 50
Nummer: 3
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Förlag: Springer

Sammanfattning

Alvin Weinberg's classic and much debated two articles in Minerva, "Criteria for Scientific Choice" (1963) and "Criteria for Scientific Choice II - The Two Cultures" (1964), represent two of the first and most important attempts to create a meta-discourse about priority setting in science policy, and many of the points advanced remain relevant. The goal of this paper is to elaborate on the relevance of some of Weinberg's original arguments to priority setting today. We have singled out four issues for attention: The tension between scientific and institutional choice, the assumptions behind the triad of scientific, technological and social merit, the elusive 'externality from size' argument for funding promoted by Weinberg, and finally the problems involved in the idea of basic science as an 'overhead cost' for applied science, and applied science as an 'overhead' on a sectoral mission. These four issues will be elaborated from a policy perspective and connected to present day challenges for science and technology policy.

Disputation

Nyckelord

  • Science General
  • Science and technology policy
  • Scientific choice
  • Applied science
  • Big
  • Science
  • Relevance

Övriga

Published
Yes
  • ISSN: 0026-4695

Box 117, 221 00 LUND
Telefon 046-222 00 00 (växel)
Telefax 046-222 47 20
lu [at] lu [dot] se

Fakturaadress: Box 188, 221 00 LUND
Organisationsnummer: 202100-3211
Om webbplatsen