Between Poor Relief and Human Capital Investments - Paradoxes in Hybrid Social Assistance
Författare
Summary, in English
Conditional cash transfers (CCTs) are often being promoted for their simultaneous advantages of short-term income protection and long-term human capital investments. Yet, existing evaluations have largely failed to test the underlying programme theory, and few empirical case studies have explored inherent contradictions and ambiguous consequences of this hybrid approach. To further understand the programmes’ social policy implications, this study identifies and analyzes such ambiguities and paradoxical consequences in the case of Uruguay’s CCT-programme, Asignaciones Familiares (AFAM). Drawing on qualitative data from inter- views with beneficiaries and members of the commission who designed the programme, this study reveals major paradoxes in AFAM’s design and implementation caused by various endogenous factors. Relevant to social policy in general, and CCT-evaluations in particular, findings also indicate that the hybrid social assistance approach may have perverse effects on the programme’s twin objectives.
Avdelning/ar
Publiceringsår
2016-05-15
Språk
Engelska
Sidor
316-335
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie
Social Policy & Administration
Volym
50
Issue
3
Fulltext
- Available as PDF - 149 kB
- Download statistics
Dokumenttyp
Artikel i tidskrift
Förlag
Wiley-Blackwell
Ämne
- Sociology
Nyckelord
- Conditional cash transfers
- Social assistance
- Poverty
- Human capital investments
- Uruguay
- Policy evaluation
Status
Published
Forskningsgrupp
- Samhälle, utveckling och miljö
ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt
- ISSN: 1467-9515