Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

The Struggle for History: Lindsay Anderson Teaches Free Cinema

Författare

Summary, in English

In spring 1986, Lindsay Anderson appeared in a television programme

on British cinema. This was part of a series of three under the heading

British Cinema: Personal View, produced by Thames Television. Anderson’s

contribution, Free Cinema 1956–? An Essay on Film by Lindsay Anderson, was

written and directed by him. He was also the star of the programme, providing a

lecture on the history of British cinema with himself at the very core, although,

at the time of the production, Anderson’s career was in decline and he was

not involved in any film projects. Drawing on press materials, the programme

itself and Anderson’s personal papers in the University of Stirling library, this

article analyses Anderson’s personal conception of Free Cinema – according to

his understanding, a short-lived documentary movement in the 1950s which

eventually transformed itself into a series of feature films in the ensuing

decades, particularly his own trilogy If. . . . (1968), O Lucky Man! (1973) and

Britannia Hospital (1982). The polemic in the programme was particularly

aimed at the general idea of the British Film Year of 1985 and at the successful

film producer David Puttnam, at the time well known for his contribution to

what was sometimes called the ‘New British Cinema’ of the 1980s. Anderson,

however, dismissed Puttnam as a film-maker concerned only with Oscars

and economic success, and instead lauded the qualities of ‘Free Cinema’, a

realist, non-conformist and radical aesthetic, as the most artistically rewarding

tradition in British cinema. The programme was highly entertaining and was

generally well received by the British press, but did not really strengthen

Anderson’s position within the British film industry, which might, or might not,

have been Anderson’s intention.

Avdelning/ar

Publiceringsår

2014

Språk

Engelska

Sidor

312-331

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

Journal of British Cinema and Television

Volym

11

Issue

2-3

Dokumenttyp

Artikel i tidskrift

Förlag

Edinburgh University Press

Ämne

  • Arts

Nyckelord

  • Lindsay Anderson
  • Free Cinema
  • British Film Year
  • Thames Television
  • David Puttnam

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 1743-4521