Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Madness in the Method: A Paradox of Inquiry Learning

Författare

Summary, in English

Hakkarainen and Sintonen (2002) praise the descriptive adequacy

of Hintikka's Interrogative Model of Inquiry (imi) to describe children's prac-

tices in an inquiry-based learning context. They further propose to use the imi

as a starting point for developing new pedagogical methods and designing new

didactic tools. We assess this proposal in the light of the formal results that

in the imi characterize interrogative learning strategies. We nd that these

results actually reveal a deep methodological issue for inquiry-based learning,

namely that educators cannot guarantee that learners will successfully acquire

a content, without limiting learner's autonomy, and that a trade-o between

success and autonomy is unavoidable. As a by-product of our argument, we

obtain a logical characterization of serendipity.

Avdelning/ar

Publiceringsår

2014

Språk

Engelska

Dokumenttyp

Working paper

Ämne

  • Learning

Nyckelord

  • Inquiry Learning Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Interrogative model Abduction

Status

Unpublished

Projekt

  • Knowledge in a Digital World: Trust, Credibility and Relevance on the Web

Forskningsgrupp

  • Lund University Information Quality Research Group (LUIQ)