Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Procedural Reasonableness and Normativity of Argumentation : Pragma-Dialectical Responses to Epistemologist Objections

In English

Författare

Summary, in English

Pragma-dialectical argumentation theory has received criticism from epistemological argumentation theorists. While the former emphasizes argumentation as aimed at resolving differences of opinion through adequate procedures, the latter emphasizes that argumentation is aimed at reaching a justified conclusion of the argumentation. In this paper pragma-dialectics is analyzed and two objections considered. The first objection pertains to the pragma-dialectical definition of reasonable argumentation, the other to the lack of an account of normativity of argumentation in pragma-dialectics. It is argued that the objections are not convincing.

Avdelning/ar

Publiceringsår

2012

Språk

Engelska

Sidor

53-69

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

Cogency - Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation

Volym

4

Issue

1

Dokumenttyp

Artikel i tidskrift

Förlag

Universidad Diego Portales

Ämne

  • Philosophy

Nyckelord

  • Pragma-Dialectics
  • Epistemology
  • Normativity
  • Discussion rules
  • Consensus
  • Reasonableness

Status

Published

Forskningsgrupp

  • CogComlab

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 0718-8285