Vulnerability and nationalism: the support for the war against Iraq in five established states
Författare
Summary, in English
This essay attempts to shed light on why aggressive ideas gain support within established western states. To do that it attempts to answer the question why the armed conflict against Iraq received such varied support during the first four months of 2003 within the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, France and Spain. A comparative study indicates that the justifications for the armed conflict must be endorsed in the national identities of the particular states. If not, either the justifications or national identities have to be modified. The dominant elite emerge as essential to this process, as does the public experience of vulnerability. It appears that the war against Iraq received such varied support because the initial definitions of national identities endorsed the justifications for the war to different degrees, the dominant elites promoted different opinions and the people experienced different degrees of vulnerability.
Avdelning/ar
- Lund University Centre for Risk Assessment and Management (LUCRAM)
- Avdelningen för Brandteknik
- Avdelningen för Riskhantering och Samhällssäkerhet
Publiceringsår
2009
Språk
Engelska
Sidor
340-360
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie
Nations and Nationalism
Volym
15
Issue
2
Länkar
Dokumenttyp
Artikel i tidskrift
Förlag
Wiley-Blackwell
Ämne
- Other Civil Engineering
- Building Technologies
- Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Nyckelord
- elite
- armed conflict
- Iraq
- nationalism
- national identity
- vulnerability
Status
Published
Forskningsgrupp
- LUCRAM (Lund University Center for Risk Analysis and Management
ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt
- ISSN: 1469-8129