Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

A comparison of two feedforward control structure assessment methods

In English

Författare

Summary, in English

The most common loop in an industrial plant is a SISO-loop with a PI(D)controller. If the loop is affected by disturbances,these can be handled by adding a feedforward control action. In an industrial control system there are many measured signals, apart from those of the loop, available. The question we address in this article is how to select the feedforward variable out of the available measurements. A comparison is made of two methods for feedforward control structure assessment. The first is a method based on comparing the actual variance with the minimum achievable variance,and thus the contribution to the overall variance. The second is a method for evaluating deterministic additive disturbances and estimate where they enter in the process. The methods complement each other and show that assessmentmethods should be handled with care, since they are mostly designed fordifferent control objectives.

Publiceringsår

2003

Språk

Engelska

Sidor

609-624

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing

Volym

17

Issue

7--9

Dokumenttyp

Artikel i tidskrift

Förlag

John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Ämne

  • Control Engineering

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 0890-6327