Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

A note on the debate on scientific process vs. design process

In English

Författare

Redaktör

  • Thomas Howard
  • Mougaard Krestine
  • McAloone Tim
  • Hansen Claus Thorp

Summary, in English

It has been often claimed that the scientific process is quite opposite to the design process, mainly based on the former’s analysis of existing phenomena in order to develop a theory, while the design process is an act of synthesis that creates something new in the world. In the light of the developments that led to this conception, and with reference to the current views of the scientific process, we maintain that the scientific process has more similarities with the design process than differences from it. As parallels can be drawn between the two processes, some implications for further research into the fundamentals of the design activity are discussed.

Avdelning/ar

Publiceringsår

2011

Språk

Engelska

Sidor

356-365

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

ICED

Volym

DS 68

Issue

2

Dokumenttyp

Konferensbidrag

Förlag

Design Society

Ämne

  • Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Nyckelord

  • Design Sciences
  • Design Method
  • Scientific Method
  • Epistemology
  • Machine Design
  • Maskinkonstruktion

Conference name

18th International Conference on Engineering Design, 2011

Conference date

2011-08-15 - 2011-08-18

Conference place

Copenhagen, Denmark

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 2220-4342
  • ISSN: 2223-7941
  • ISBN: 978-1-904670-32-2