Meny

Javascript verkar inte påslaget? - Vissa delar av Lunds universitets webbplats fungerar inte optimalt utan javascript, kontrollera din webbläsares inställningar.
Du är här

Operative and justificatory grounds in legal argumentation

Redaktör:
  • Krister Segerberg
  • Rysiek Sliwinski
Publiceringsår: 2003
Språk: Engelska
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie: Logic, law, morality: thirteen essays in practical philosophy in honour of Lennart Åqvist
Dokumenttyp: Del av eller Kapitel i bok
Förlag: Uppsala: Dept. of Philosophy [Filosofiska institutionen]

Sammanfattning

A legal term that serves as a middle term in legal inferences can do so in different ways. A distinction between ‘mere’ vehicles of inference and operative middle terms will be shown to be important. It will be indicated how operative conditions give rise to the question of justificatory conformity or unconformity. At the end of the paper, it will be suggested how justificatory conformity is relevant to the coherence of legal argumentation.

Disputation

Nyckelord

  • Law and Political Science
  • justificatory conformity
  • operative conditions
  • vehicles of inference
  • coherence.
  • law
  • rättsvetenskap

Övriga

Published
  • ISBN: 9150616722

Box 117, 221 00 LUND
Telefon 046-222 00 00 (växel)
Telefax 046-222 47 20
lu [at] lu [dot] se

Fakturaadress: Box 188, 221 00 LUND
Organisationsnummer: 202100-3211
Om webbplatsen