Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

An evaluation of methods for prioritizing software requirements

In English

Författare

Summary, in English

This article describes an evaluation of six different methods for prioritizing software requirements. Based on the quality requirements for a telephony system, the authors individually used all six methods on separate occasions to prioritize the requirements. The methods were then characterized according to a number of criteria from a user's perspective. We found the analytic hierarchy process to be the most promising method, although it may be problematic to scale-up. In an industrial follow-up study we used the analytic hierarchy process to further investigate its applicability. We found that the process is demanding but worth the effort because of its ability to provide reliable results, promote knowledge transfer and create consensus among project members.

Publiceringsår

1998

Språk

Engelska

Sidor

939-947

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

Information and Software Technology

Volym

39

Issue

14-15

Dokumenttyp

Artikel i tidskrift

Förlag

Elsevier

Ämne

  • Computer Science

Nyckelord

  • engineering
  • Requirements
  • prioritising
  • Experimental evaluation

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 0950-5849