Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Overextension in Verb Conjunctions

Författare

Summary, in English

Hampton (1988) discovered that people are subject to overextension they categorize some things as falling under a conjunction (e.g., they categorize chess as a sport which is also a game) but not as falling under both of the corresponding conjuncts they do not categorize chess as a sport). Although subsequent literature has replicated this effect with a wider range of constructions than those originally used by Hampton, the reseaiTch so far has been exclusively concerned with various ifoiTins of noun compounds. This article generalizes the previous findings to the domain of verb conjunctions. By using a novel paradigm for studying overextensi on effects, this study demonstrates a very strong overextension effect for conjunctions of gerunds (e.g., walking and smoking). The author discusses the implications of the new findings for available explanations of overextension.

Avdelning/ar

Publiceringsår

2015

Språk

Engelska

Sidor

1917-1922

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Volym

41

Issue

6

Dokumenttyp

Artikel i tidskrift

Förlag

American Psychological Association (APA)

Ämne

  • General Language Studies and Linguistics

Nyckelord

  • the conjunction fallacy
  • compensation
  • verbs
  • conceptual combination
  • overextension
  • conjunctions

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 0278-7393