Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Rätt utan Sanning?

In English

Författare

  • Moa Bladini

Summary, in English

The legitimacy of the judiciary hinges on the presumption that truth can be found through the judicial process. Even though a distinction can be made between "truth" in a legal sense and "real truth", the legal truth can only be justified by its anchorage in "real truth". During the last few decades, the previosly all-powerful assumption of the objective nature of reality and knowledge has been challanged and criticized. Ideas of a more relativistic character has have gained influence in both science and society more generally. This article highlights questions such as how recent challenges to objectivistic views of knowledge and reality affect the legitimacy of the judiciary and the judicial process as it is today without recourse to objective truth. The article also points at recent developments in the criminal procedure from a realistic versus relativistic ideal. Changes in the Code of Judicial Procedure and the Mediation Processas an alternative to the traditional criminal procedureare discussed as examples of these recent developments.

Publiceringsår

2008

Språk

Svenska

Sidor

243-258

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

Nordisk tidsskrift for kriminalvidenskab

Volym

95 (2008)

Issue

3

Dokumenttyp

Artikel i tidskrift

Förlag

De Nordiske Kriminalistforeninger

Ämne

  • Law

Nyckelord

  • processrätt
  • straffrätt
  • paradigmskifte
  • Sanning
  • criminal law
  • civil and criminal procedur

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 0029-1528