Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

A proposal that does not advance our understanding of hypnosis

Författare

Summary, in English

In his paper Hypnosis Reconsidered, Resituated, and Redefined

(JSE 26(2):297–327), Adam Crabtree, a distinguished expert in the history of hypnosis, maintains that contemporary hypnosis research suffers from conceptual disorder. In his words, he attempts to redefi ne hypnosis in order to provide a stronger ground for future research. We find that his proposed reconsideration of hypnosis as a form of “trance” characterized by a focus

on internal stimuli and involving the recruitment of appropriate subliminal resources is neither novel nor helpful to our current understanding of hypnosis. Among the problems we find with his paper is that it is conceptually unclear and is not informed by current research and theory; for instance, it disregards well-established findings such as individual differences in responsiveness to hypnosis and the importance of suggestion for the elicitation

of hypnotic phenomena. Historical knowledge of a field is invaluable

but is alone insufficient to understand its current status or propose pathways for future research and theory.

Publiceringsår

2012

Språk

Engelska

Sidor

329-339

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

Journal of Scientific Exploration

Volym

26

Issue

2

Dokumenttyp

Artikel i tidskrift

Förlag

Society for Scientific Exploration

Ämne

  • Psychology

Nyckelord

  • hypnosis
  • suggestion
  • trance

Status

Published

Forskningsgrupp

  • CERCAP (Center for Research on Consciousness and Anomalous Psychology)

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 0892-3310