Choice blindness and the non-unitary nature of the mind (Commentary on von Hippel and Trivers)
Författare
Summary, in Swedish
Abstract in Undetermined
Experiments on choice blindness support von Hippel & Trivers's (VH&T's) conception of the mind as fundamentally divided, but they also highlight a problem for VH&T's idea of non-conscious self-deception: If I try to trick you into believing that I have a certain preference, and the best way is to also trick myself, I might actually end up having that preference, at all levels of processing.
Experiments on choice blindness support von Hippel & Trivers's (VH&T's) conception of the mind as fundamentally divided, but they also highlight a problem for VH&T's idea of non-conscious self-deception: If I try to trick you into believing that I have a certain preference, and the best way is to also trick myself, I might actually end up having that preference, at all levels of processing.
Avdelning/ar
Publiceringsår
2011
Språk
Engelska
Sidor
28-29
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volym
34
Issue
1
Dokumenttyp
Artikel i tidskrift
Förlag
Cambridge University Press
Ämne
- General Language Studies and Linguistics
- Learning
- Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Status
Published
Projekt
- Thinking in Time: Cognition, Communication and Learning
Forskningsgrupp
- Lund University Cognitive Science (LUCS)
ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt
- ISSN: 1469-1825