The Endurance/Perdurance Controversy is No Storm in a Teacup
Författare
Summary, in English
Several philosophers have maintained in recent years that the endurance/perdurance debate is merely verbal: these prima facie distinct theories of objects’ persistence are in fact metaphysically equivalent, they claim. The present paper challenges this view. Three proposed translation schemes (those set forth by Miller 2005; McCall and Lowe 2006; Hirsch 2009) are examined; all are shown to be faulty. In the process, constructive reasons for regarding the debate as a substantive one are provided. It is also suggested that the theories may have differing practical implications.
Avdelning/ar
- Teoretisk filosofi
- Metaphysics and Collectivity
Publiceringsår
2014
Språk
Engelska
Sidor
463-482
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie
Axiomathes
Volym
24
Issue
4
Fulltext
- Available as PDF - 312 kB
- Download statistics
Länkar
Dokumenttyp
Artikel i tidskrift
Förlag
Springer
Ämne
- Philosophy
Nyckelord
- endurance
- metaphysical equivalence
- perdurance
- persistence
- verbal dispute
- deflationism
Status
Published
Projekt
- Social Ontology and Theories of Persistence
Forskningsgrupp
- Metaphysics and Collectivity
ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt
- ISSN: 1572-8390