Javascript verkar inte påslaget? - Vissa delar av Lunds universitets webbplats fungerar inte optimalt utan javascript, kontrollera din webbläsares inställningar.
Du är här

Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets

  • Pete Smith
  • Gert-Jan Nabuurs
  • Ivan A. Janssens
  • Stefan Reis
  • Gregg Marland
  • Jean-Francois Soussana
  • Torben Christensen
  • Linda Heath
  • Mike Apps
  • Vlady Alexeyev
  • Jingyun Fang
  • Jean-Pierre Gattuso
  • Juan Pablo Guerschman
  • Yao Huang
  • Esteban Jobbagy
  • Daniel Murdiyarso
  • Jian Ni
  • Antonio Nobre
  • Changhui Peng
  • Adrian Walcroft
  • Shao Qiang Wang
  • Yude Pan
  • Guang Sheng Zhou
Publiceringsår: 2008
Språk: Engelska
Sidor: 209-249
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie: Climatic Change
Volym: 88
Nummer: 3-4
Dokumenttyp: Artikel i tidskrift
Förlag: Springer


Humans utilise about 40% of the earth's net primary production (NPP) but the products of this NPP are often managed by different sectors, with timber and forest products managed by the forestry sector and food and fibre products from croplands and grasslands managed by the agricultural sector. Other significant anthropogenic impacts on the global carbon cycle include human utilization of fossil fuels and impacts on less intensively managed systems such as peatlands, wetlands and permafrost. A great deal of knowledge, expertise and data is available within each sector. We describe the contribution of sectoral carbon budgets to our understanding of the global carbon cycle. Whilst many sectors exhibit similarities for carbon budgeting, some key differences arise due to differences in goods and services provided, ecology, management practices used, land-management personnel responsible, policies affecting land management, data types and availability, and the drivers of change. We review the methods and data sources available for assessing sectoral carbon budgets, and describe some of key data limitations and uncertainties for each sector in different regions of the world. We identify the main gaps in our knowledge/data, show that coverage is better for the developed world for most sectors, and suggest how sectoral carbon budgets could be improved in the future. Research priorities include the development of shared protocols through site networks, a move to full carbon accounting within sectors, and the assessment of full greenhouse gas budgets.


  • Physical Geography


  • ISSN: 0165-0009

Box 117, 221 00 LUND
Telefon 046-222 00 00 (växel)
Telefax 046-222 47 20
lu [at] lu [dot] se

Fakturaadress: Box 188, 221 00 LUND
Organisationsnummer: 202100-3211
Om webbplatsen