Meny

Javascript verkar inte påslaget? - Vissa delar av Lunds universitets webbplats fungerar inte optimalt utan javascript, kontrollera din webbläsares inställningar.
Du är här

Madness as the Foundation of Non-Culpability

Författare:
Publiceringsår: 2015
Språk: Engelska
Sidor:
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie: Lund University Faculty of Medicine Doctoral Dissertation Series
Volym: 2015:145
Dokumenttyp: Doktorsavhandling
Förlag: Lund University

Sammanfattning

Doctoral dissertation

Abstract



Background

The relation between mental illness and accountability, may at its best be described as unclear. A negative correlation them between was established thousands of years ago, and has since formed a more or less self-evident supposition. This dissertation is an effort to test this construction.



Aims and hypothesis

The overall aim of this thesis is to clarify the relation between mental illness and accountability and to scrutinize which variables may be considered to be of importance and significance when deliberating on someone’s criminal responsibility.



Methods

Initially some central notions were conceptually analysed. The next step consisted of interviews with Swedish forensic psychiatric patients (n=46) and professionals (n=150). Patients were asked to describe their experience of the circumstances leading up to the crime. Professionals were asked to assess 12 psychiatric diagnostic in terms of negative influence on accountability.



Results

Swedish forensic patients (i) point to other circumstances than mental illness as the main cause of their crime and (ii) regardless of main psychiatric diagnosis sued to have been aware of the nature their action, stressing (iii) damaged action control and inability to identify attractive action alternatives. Swedish forensic professionals (i) stated to a large extent that they never before had acknowledge this relationship and (ii) regardless of sex, age, working experience, education and geographical location no significant differences was found in the result of their assessments.



Conclusions

The (i) understanding, (ii) diagnostics and (iii) treatment of persons with dysfunctional behaviour patterns will most certainly benefit from a paradigm shift, in which unconscious consensus and self-evident artefacts are replaced by first person experiences and skilled professional responsiveness.

Disputation

2015-12-16
13:00
Fernströmsalen, Biomedicinskt centrum, Sölvegatan 19, Lund
  • Niklas Juth (Bitr Professor)

Nyckelord

  • Psychiatry
  • criminal responsibility
  • psychiatric care
  • psychiatric diagnostics
  • accountability
  • Mental illness

Övriga

Published
  • Helge Malmgren
  • Bengt Brülde
  • Meyer Lennart
  • Sten Levander
  • Björn Hofvander
  • ISSN: 1652-8220
  • ISBN: 978-91-7619-225-2

Box 117, 221 00 LUND
Telefon 046-222 00 00 (växel)
Telefax 046-222 47 20
lu [at] lu [dot] se

Fakturaadress: Box 188, 221 00 LUND
Organisationsnummer: 202100-3211
Om webbplatsen