Incommensurability and Vagueness
Författare
Summary, in English
Two items are commensurable in value if and only if one of them is better than the other or if they are equally as good. They are incommensurable if none of these relations obtains. Given incommensurability, not even a purely ordinal measure is available for comparison: We cannot represent the relationship between the items by assigning a number to each that specifies the position of that item in the value ordering.
This paper casts doubts on John Broome’s argument that vagueness in value comparisons crowds out incommensurability. It also shows how vagueness can be injected into a formal model of value relations that has room for different types of incommensurability. The model implements some basic insights of the ‘fitting attitudes’-analysis of value.
This paper casts doubts on John Broome’s argument that vagueness in value comparisons crowds out incommensurability. It also shows how vagueness can be injected into a formal model of value relations that has room for different types of incommensurability. The model implements some basic insights of the ‘fitting attitudes’-analysis of value.
Avdelning/ar
Publiceringsår
2009
Språk
Engelska
Sidor
71-94
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
Volym
83
Fulltext
- Available as PDF - 304 kB
- Download statistics
Dokumenttyp
Artikel i tidskrift
Förlag
Oxford University Press
Ämne
- Philosophy
Status
Published
ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt
- ISSN: 1467-9264