Du är här

Post-decision consolidation and distortion of facts

Författare:
Publiceringsår: 2009
Språk: Engelska
Sidor: 397-407
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie: Judgment and Decision Making
Volym: 4
Nummer: 5
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Förlag: Society for Judgment and Decision Making

Sammanfattning

Participants decided whom of two patients to prioritize for surgery in three studies. The factual quantitative information about the patients (e.g., probability of surviving surgery) was given in vignette form with case descriptions on Visual Analogue Scales - VAS's. Differentiation and Consolidation theory predicts that not only the attractiveness of facts but also the mental representations of objective facts themselves will be restructured in post-decision processes in support of a decision (Svenson, 2003). After the decision, participants were asked to reproduce the objective facts about the patients. The results showed that distortions of objective facts were used to consolidate a prior decision. The consolidation process relied on facts initially favoring the non-chosen alternative and on facts rated as less, rather than more important.

Disputation

Nyckelord

  • Medicine and Health Sciences
  • differentiation and consolidation
  • coherence
  • medical decisions
  • cognitive psychology
  • decision making

Övriga

Published
Yes
  • ISSN: 1930-2975

Box 117, 221 00 LUND
Telefon 046-222 00 00 (växel)
Telefax 046-222 47 20
lu [at] lu [dot] se

 

Fakturaadress: Box 188, 221 00 LUND
Organisationsnummer: 202100-3211
Om webbplatsen