Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Post-decision consolidation and distortion of facts

Författare

Summary, in English

Participants decided whom of two patients to prioritize for surgery in three studies. The factual quantitative information about the patients (e.g., probability of surviving surgery) was given in vignette form with case descriptions on Visual Analogue Scales - VAS's. Differentiation and Consolidation theory predicts that not only the attractiveness of facts but also the mental representations of objective facts themselves will be restructured in post-decision processes in support of a decision (Svenson, 2003). After the decision, participants were asked to reproduce the objective facts about the patients. The results showed that distortions of objective facts were used to consolidate a prior decision. The consolidation process relied on facts initially favoring the non-chosen alternative and on facts rated as less, rather than more important.

Publiceringsår

2009

Språk

Engelska

Sidor

397-407

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

Judgment and Decision Making

Volym

4

Issue

5

Dokumenttyp

Artikel i tidskrift

Förlag

Society for Judgment and Decision Making

Ämne

  • Psychology

Nyckelord

  • differentiation and consolidation
  • coherence
  • medical decisions
  • cognitive psychology
  • decision making

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 1930-2975