Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Images of Risk Taking : On Graffiti as Process and Gesture

Författare

Summary, in English

At the IMAGE=GESTURE conference, I presented my thoughts on graffiti – which is related to, but still rather distinct from, street art (my dissertation topic) – and the way that this type of expression functions as a gesture.



In his book "Taking the train: how graffiti art became an urban crisis in New York City", associate professor of History Joe Austin discusses the discursive construction of graffiti as “a dangerous and even subversive threat to local authority” instead of what the author polemically describes as “perhaps the most important art movement of the late twentieth century”.



It is my argument that the illegal and clandestine nature of graffiti is today an integral part of this specific arts practice and that it is essential for an understanding of visual graffiti expressions as gestures. In accepting and eventually embracing the dominant discourse and understanding of graffiti as problematic, agents within the subculture have reached a point where graffiti is not seen solely as visual and aesthetic expressions, but also as indexical signs of the unsanctioned and often illegal act of graffiti writing itself. As a consequence of the public discourse on graffiti, it has become prestigious to paint in high-risk spots (e.g. places that are hard to reach and/or publicly expose the writer and the illegal act), even if painting in such places means that the end result may not be as visually and stylistically accomplished and complex as pieces painted in undisturbed locations.



While aesthetics still play a central role in the graffiti world, it is clear that graffiti expressions are not solely being judged on a scale of aesthetic value, but also in relation to their context and as signs of the process that has gone before the end result. Where outsiders may see a hastily and smudged tag, agents within the subculture may instead focus on the skill required to create the tag in that particular location. In the latter perspective, it is my argument that the graffiti image becomes a gesture which points to a meaning beyond its own being-as-image.

Ämne

  • Art History

Nyckelord

  • graffiti
  • street art
  • gesture
  • counterculture
  • subculture
  • risk
  • indexicality

Conference name

Nomadikon 2011

Conference date

2011-11-09 - 2011-11-09

Conference place

Bergen, Norway

Aktiv

Published

Projekt

  • The Street Art World