Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Do We Need a Distinction between Arguments and Adjuncts? Evidence from Psycholinguistic Studies of Comprehension

In English

Författare

  • Damon Tutunjian
  • Julie E. Boland

Summary, in English

Within both psycholinguistic theories of parsing and formal theories of syntax, a

distinction between arguments and adjuncts is central to some theories, while

minimized or denied by others. Even for theories that deem the argument/

adjunct distinction important, the exact nature of the distinction has been difficult

to characterize. In this article, we review the psycholinguistic evidence for an

argument/adjunct distinction, discuss how argument status can best be defined in

the light of such evidence, and consider the implications for how grammatical

knowledge is represented and accessed in the human mind.

Publiceringsår

2008

Språk

Engelska

Sidor

631-646

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

Language and Linguistics Compass

Volym

2

Issue

4

Dokumenttyp

Artikel i tidskrift

Förlag

John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Ämne

  • General Language Studies and Linguistics

Nyckelord

  • Psycholinguistics
  • sentence processing
  • arguments and adjuncts
  • eyetracking.

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 1749-818X