Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Image analysis of prostate cancer tissue biomarkers

Författare

  • Giuseppe Lippolis

Summary, in Swedish

Popular Abstract in English

Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world and the second most

common in men. The western world has the highest incidence rates. The causes of

prostate cancer are not yet clear, however a number of risk factors have been

identified such as familial history, ethnicity, diet and genetic events. Prostate cancer

affects primarily elderly men with the majority of the cases happening above 65

years of age. If caught at an early stage, prostate cancer is curable by removal of the

whole prostate whereas advanced or recurrent disease is lethal and only palliative

methods are available for patients.

Nowadays the tools to diagnose the disease include PSA blood test and a rectal

examination conducted by a pathologist to detect suspicious lumps. PSA is a protein

produced by the prostate; when its amount goes up beyond a certain level, it may

indicate cancer or other pathological conditions that are not life threatening. The

only way to be sure that a patient harbours a tumour in the prostate, is to perform a

biopsy (generally from multiple areas at once) and analyse it using a microscope.

The problem with blood PSA test is that it unfortunately detects many false

positives. This can expose the patient to unnecessary treatment and side effects.

The biopsy is used not only to diagnose, but also to assess the potential

aggressiveness of the disease by looking at the architecture of the tumour lesions

and assigning the so-called “Gleason grade”. The Gleason grade is a prognostic tool,

meaning that it is able to predict, to a certain extent, the development of the disease

and the response to treatments.

In order to improve both diagnosis and prognosis, we need more reliable markers.

A class of such markers is represented by proteins present in the prostatic tissue.

Traditionally the way to look at them is by using a normal light microscope,

however, this technique is slow and prone to errors and inconsistencies.

In this thesis we investigated the role of ERG, TATI, PSA and AR proteins in

prostate cancer by using novel methodologies based on Time Resolved

Fluorescence Imaging, digital imaging and automated image analysis.

In paper I we analysed the expression of ERG and TATI in prostate cancer from

4177 patients with a localized disease. We observed that the two proteins were

mutually exclusive, as cancer cells that expressed one, did not express the other.

This finding is very important because confirms the heterogeneity of prostate cancer

66

and identifies different families of cancer cells. As a result, the research could focus

on targeted therapies and personalized treatments.

In paper II, III and IV we introduced the use of image analysis to study tissue

biomarkers. In paper II and III we develop a system for automatic analysis of PSA

and AR in tissue sections employing mathematical algorithms for alignment of

images, recognition of specific areas of interest within the tissue, and quantification

of the markers in those areas. To quantify the markers, we used a novel fluorescence

technique that has several advantages over other existing methods. Moreover the

use of computerized image analysis allows for consistent and reproducible

assessment of tissue sections. Our methods allowed us to observe some interesting

expression patterns of the proteins in different clusters of tumour cells and in normal

tissue. This kind of differential expression would need to be analysed further to

uncover some aspects of the disease. Finally in paper IV we developed an algorithm

for automated Gleason grading, which is a system that resembles the pathologist

analysis. The system was able to recognize with high accuracy the different Gleason

grades and it represents a promising supporting tool for aiding pathologists’ work

and possibly increasing the accuracy of prognosis.

Avdelning/ar

Publiceringsår

2015

Språk

Engelska

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

Lund University Faculty of Medicine Doctoral Dissertation Series

Volym

2015:65

Dokumenttyp

Doktorsavhandling

Förlag

Division of Urological Cancers

Ämne

  • Urology and Nephrology
  • Cancer and Oncology

Nyckelord

  • prostate cancer
  • image analysis
  • Time Resolved Fluorescence
  • automated Gleason
  • PSA
  • AR
  • fusion gene
  • TMAs

Status

Published

Forskningsgrupp

  • Urological cancer, Malmö

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 1652-8220
  • ISBN: 978-91-7619-144-6

Försvarsdatum

28 maj 2015

Försvarstid

13:00

Försvarsplats

Lecture Hall, Pathology building, Jan Waldenströms gata 59, Malmö

Opponent

  • Johan Lundin (MD, PhD)