Du är här

Detection or isolation of defects? An experimental comparison of unit testing and code inspection

Författare:
Publiceringsår: 2003
Språk: Engelska
Sidor: 3-13
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie: 14th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering
Dokumenttyp: Konferensbidrag
Förlag: IEEE Comput. Soc

Sammanfattning

Code inspections and white-box testing have both been used for unit testing. One is a static analysis technique, the other, a dynamic one, since it is based on executing test cases. Naturally, the question arises whether one is superior to the other, or, whether either technique is better suited to detect or isolate certain types of defects. We investigated this question with an experiment with a focus on detection of the defects (failures) and isolation of the underlying sources of the defects (faults). The results indicate that there exist significant differences for some of the effects of using code inspection versus testing. White-box testing is more effective, i.e. detects significantly more defects while inspection isolates the underlying source of a larger share of the defects detected. Testers spend significantly more time, hence the difference in efficiency is smaller, and is not statistically significant. The two techniques are also shown to detect and identify different defects, hence motivating the use of a combination of methods

Disputation

Nyckelord

  • Technology and Engineering
  • fault detection
  • failure detection
  • defect isolation
  • defect detection
  • unit testing
  • code inspection
  • white-box testing
  • static analysis
  • test case execution
  • controlled experiment

Övriga

14th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering
17-20 Nov. 2003
Denver, CO, USA
Published
Yes
  • Software Engineering
  • ISBN: 0-7695-2007-3

Box 117, 221 00 LUND
Telefon 046-222 00 00 (växel)
Telefax 046-222 47 20
lu [at] lu [dot] se

 

Fakturaadress: Box 188, 221 00 LUND
Organisationsnummer: 202100-3211
Om webbplatsen