Consensual Approaches to Siting Controversy
Författare
Redaktör
- Ben Obinero Uwakweh
- Issam A. Minkarah
Summary, in English
opinion should be considered as a relevant area of expertise for project managers and as an essential cost
element in the planning and completion of construction projects.
A consensual approach to a siting controversy requires informal face-to-face interaction among chosen
representatives from all stake-holding groups. The basis of a consensual approach is to seek all-gain
solutions rather than win-lose solutions or political compromise.
Consensual approaches to solve conflicts between project stakeholders should increase the efficiency in
the construction process. Conflicts between project stakeholders should be solved in dialogue to seek the
best solution for all parties, instead of end up in court where the purpose is to interpret the law, not to
reconcile conflicting interests.
This paper will describe a consensual approach to siting controversy, with focus on analysis and
management of project stakeholders. The City tunnel project in Malmoe, Sweden, is used to exemplify a
stakeholder management process and how their efforts correspond to a consensual approach.
Avdelning/ar
- Construction Management
Publiceringsår
2002
Språk
Engelska
Sidor
909-920
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie
Proceedings from the Organization and Management of Construction, 10th International Symposium, Construction Innovation and Global Competitiveness
Dokumenttyp
Konferensbidrag
Förlag
CRC Press
Ämne
- Construction Management
Conference name
The Organization and Management of Construction, 10th International Symposium, Construction Innovation and Global Competitiveness
Conference date
0001-01-02
Conference place
University of Cincinnati, United States
Status
Published
ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt
- ISBN: 0-8493-1449-6