Supply Chain Designs for Preparedness
Författare
Summary, in English
Purpose of this research
The ability to quickly respond presupposes logistics systems designed to be responsive; supply chains must prepare to act if specific circumstances occur. By investigating ‘preparedness’ in a defence logistics context, the overall research objectives are to define ‘preparedness’ and to advance defence logistics as an academic research area.
Design/methodology/approach
We started with an explorative phase to understand the subject matter. This we combined with literature studies of defence logistics, of preparedness, and of supply chain design to articulate two research questions;
RQ1: In what ways do supply chain designs differ between non-preparedness structures and preparedness structures?
RQ2: How does interorganisational interaction in the preparedness phase influence logistics efficiency in the response phase?
We applied an embedded case study design collecting data from two units of analysis. Research rigour was assessed as dependability, confirmability, transferability, and credibility.
Findings
Each of the four papers shed lights to the overarching research objectives. Building on the explorative phase (Papers I and II), Study 1 (Paper III) answers RQ1. We could not conclude that supply chains differed between preparedness and non-preparedness, but concluded that efficiency rather than responsiveness was emphasised. Study 2 (Paper IV) relates to RQ2, and confirmed that suppliers are not involved in preparedness planning. Although inter-organisational coordination takes place prior to deployment, inter-organisational interaction is not emphasised.
Research limitations
We focussed on interfaces between the Defence and upstream supply chain actors related to EU missions. We have no indications whether supply chain designs differ between NATO, UN, and EU operations. We studied relatively standardised supplies / services. Our findings might not apply to other types of defence supply chains. And our conclusions might not apply for larger nations, or for nations outside NATO / PfP.
Research implications
By relating preparedness to a context characterised by increased outsourcing, we emphasise the importance a true (defence) supply chain orientation. We propose to study other supply chains of standardised supplies and services, of complex deliveries, and for units designated for national defence, to broaden our knowledge about defence supply chain designs.
Practical implications
Preparedness presupposes appropriate organisational measures throughout the supply chain. Preparedness organisations need to critically examine how to ensure reliable responsiveness when major parts of the logistics lie outside hierarchical control. Defence organisations need to include suppliers in preparedness planning, in operations planning, and in exercises in order to ensure appropriate interaction.
Originality / value
The term ‘preparedness’ is rarely operationalised in logistics and SCM literature. This research contributes to enhance our understanding of preparedness as a supply chain construct. We also contribute to advancing defence logistics as a field of knowledge based on scientific inquiries.
The ability to quickly respond presupposes logistics systems designed to be responsive; supply chains must prepare to act if specific circumstances occur. By investigating ‘preparedness’ in a defence logistics context, the overall research objectives are to define ‘preparedness’ and to advance defence logistics as an academic research area.
Design/methodology/approach
We started with an explorative phase to understand the subject matter. This we combined with literature studies of defence logistics, of preparedness, and of supply chain design to articulate two research questions;
RQ1: In what ways do supply chain designs differ between non-preparedness structures and preparedness structures?
RQ2: How does interorganisational interaction in the preparedness phase influence logistics efficiency in the response phase?
We applied an embedded case study design collecting data from two units of analysis. Research rigour was assessed as dependability, confirmability, transferability, and credibility.
Findings
Each of the four papers shed lights to the overarching research objectives. Building on the explorative phase (Papers I and II), Study 1 (Paper III) answers RQ1. We could not conclude that supply chains differed between preparedness and non-preparedness, but concluded that efficiency rather than responsiveness was emphasised. Study 2 (Paper IV) relates to RQ2, and confirmed that suppliers are not involved in preparedness planning. Although inter-organisational coordination takes place prior to deployment, inter-organisational interaction is not emphasised.
Research limitations
We focussed on interfaces between the Defence and upstream supply chain actors related to EU missions. We have no indications whether supply chain designs differ between NATO, UN, and EU operations. We studied relatively standardised supplies / services. Our findings might not apply to other types of defence supply chains. And our conclusions might not apply for larger nations, or for nations outside NATO / PfP.
Research implications
By relating preparedness to a context characterised by increased outsourcing, we emphasise the importance a true (defence) supply chain orientation. We propose to study other supply chains of standardised supplies and services, of complex deliveries, and for units designated for national defence, to broaden our knowledge about defence supply chain designs.
Practical implications
Preparedness presupposes appropriate organisational measures throughout the supply chain. Preparedness organisations need to critically examine how to ensure reliable responsiveness when major parts of the logistics lie outside hierarchical control. Defence organisations need to include suppliers in preparedness planning, in operations planning, and in exercises in order to ensure appropriate interaction.
Originality / value
The term ‘preparedness’ is rarely operationalised in logistics and SCM literature. This research contributes to enhance our understanding of preparedness as a supply chain construct. We also contribute to advancing defence logistics as a field of knowledge based on scientific inquiries.
Avdelning/ar
Publiceringsår
2015
Språk
Engelska
Dokumenttyp
Doktorsavhandling
Ämne
- Business Administration
Nyckelord
- defence supply chains
- responsiveness
- efficiency
- civilising
- preparedness
- defence logistics
Status
Published
Handledare
ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt
- ISBN: 978-91-7623-321-4
- ISBN: 978-91-7623-322-1
- LUTMDN/TMTP-0057-SE
Försvarsdatum
11 september 2015
Försvarstid
13:00
Försvarsplats
Room M:B, M-building, Ole Römers väg 1, Lund University Faculty of Engineering, LTH
Opponent
- Heaslip Graham E. (Dr.)