Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Current issues in pictorial semiotics. Lecture three: From the Critique of the Iconicity Critique to Pictorality

Författare

Summary, in English

In order to show why Eco, Goodman, and others were wrong in their classical critique of iconicity, we will pursue a close reading of Peirce, but we will interpret his text in accordance with more recent findings in cognitive and perceptual psychology. We will arrive at the conclusion that there are two very different kinds of iconicity, which we will call primary and secondary iconicity. Even so, pictorial iconicity has its peculiarities, which we will also try to elucidate. We will also consider to what extent the linguistic model may still be helpful, and in which respects it is misleading.

Avdelning/ar

Publiceringsår

2006

Språk

Engelska

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

Semiotics Institute Online

Dokumenttyp

Working paper

Ämne

  • Languages and Literature

Nyckelord

  • secondary iconic signs
  • primary iconic signs
  • Eco
  • Goodman
  • Biermann
  • pictoriality
  • iconicity
  • semiotics
  • argument of symmetry
  • resemantization
  • density
  • argument of regressio

Status

Published