Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Surveillance of Vaccine Safety: Comparison of parental reports with routine surveillance and a clinical trial

Författare

Summary, in English

One way to maintain confidence in vaccination programmes is to improve monitoring of immunisation safety. We studied active parental reporting of adverse events after a booster dose of diphtheria-tetanus toxoid (DT). 7193 children received the vaccine. Questionnaires were submitted by 84.2% of the parents, who reported reactions for 9.2% of the children. Four percent of events were classified as moderate/severe by interviews. Relative risk of redness and swelling reported was 0.24 (95% CI. 0.13-0.42) compared to a clinical trial, while it was 71.0 (44-114) compared to passive surveillance. Active surveillance by parental reports is a useful complement to passive surveillance of childhood immunisations to generate hypotheses for evaluation in controlled studies. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Publiceringsår

2009

Språk

Engelska

Sidor

2042-2047

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

Vaccine

Volym

27

Issue

14

Dokumenttyp

Artikel i tidskrift

Förlag

Elsevier

Ämne

  • Nursing
  • Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Nyckelord

  • Local reactions
  • Vaccine safety
  • Parental reports

Status

Published

Forskningsgrupp

  • Family Medicine and Community Medicine

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 1873-2518