Sustaining Social Interaction in Public Squares After Dark : A socio-physical perspective on the lighting-behaviour relationship
Att Främja Social Interaktion på Offentliga Torg efter Mörkrets Inbrott : Ett socio-fysiskt perspektiv på sambandet mellan belysning och beteende
Författare
Summary, in Swedish
After dark, electric lighting is necessary for sustaining activities, including social interaction, in public squares. Lighting may support user needs such as accessibility, reassurance, comfort, restorativeness, and atmosphere, all of which are essential for facilitating movement, enabling stationary activities, and encouraging social interaction in public squares after dark. In countries at northern latitudes, where daylight hours are limited in winter, lighting design becomes instrumental in sustaining social life in public squares after dark. However, the impact of lighting on people’s experiences of public squares after dark, and how specific lighting characteristics may influence behavioural outcomes in such spaces, is poorly understood.
This thesis aims to investigate the relationship between spatial light characteristics, perceived atmosphere, and social interaction in public squares after dark. By adopting a socio-physical perspective on the lighting-behaviour relationship, it proposes a conceptual model to further our understanding of human-environment transactions in public squares after dark. The thesis thereby expands the knowledge on the role of lighting in sustaining social interaction in public squares after dark.
The socio-physical conceptual model illustrates the transactional relationship between the individual, the environmental setting, the environmental appraisal and the behavioural outcome. It stipulates that the individual’s appraisal, and therefore her behaviour, are influenced by lighting conditions. The model was applied in four empirical field studies conducted in two differently illuminated public squares (Kirseberg Square and Lindeborg Square) in Malmö, Sweden.
Study 1 (S1) and Study 2 (S2) focused on the behavioural outcome using direct, structured observations to compare user behaviour in daylight (DL) and in electric lighting (EL) after dark in the two squares. S1 investigated movements and stationary activities and tested whether any change in these behaviours could be attributed to the effect of change in ambient light levels. S2 investigated social interaction by comparing the occurrences of people visiting the squares alone, in pairs, or in groups of three or larger, in DL and in EL. The objective was to establish whether social interaction was sustained at the same time of day in EL after dark.
Study 3 (S3), a survey, focused on the assessment of users’ environmental appraisals (interpretation and evaluation) of the two squares by comparing the appraisals in DL and in EL after dark. Furthermore, it investigated any associations between appraisals of perceived atmosphere and self-reported social interaction after dark.
Finally, Study 4 (S4), a lighting intervention, focused on the environmental setting in Kirseberg Square, investigating the influence of spatial light characteristics on users’ environmental appraisals in this square after dark.
The findings from the observational studies (S1 and S2) suggest that electric lighting can sustain spatiotemporal patterns of user behaviour, including movements, stationary activities and social interaction in public squares after dark. It was found that the change in behaviour of stationary activities and social interaction could be attributed to the effect of change in ambient light level between DL and EL. The results suggest that the facilitation of stationary activities and social interaction requires special attention to perceptual attributes of light, in specific the level of uniformity and contrasts in the visual field.
The results of the survey (S3) show that users’ environmental appraisals of perceived lighting qualities, visual accessibility, reassurance and atmosphere were consistently assessed as higher in DL than in EL in both squares. Furthermore, the findings suggest that users’ self-reported social interaction is associated with the perceived atmosphere in EL after dark.
The results of the lighting intervention (S4) in Kirseberg Square suggest that spatial light characteristics are an important consideration for the appreciation of space and for the enhancement of atmosphere in public squares after dark. It is proposed that a balance of luminance in the visual field is beneficial for the appreciation of space and for atmosphere enhancement.
The thesis concludes that social interaction in public squares after dark can be sustained with lighting, and it emphasizes that lighting design criteria for public squares should extend beyond providing visual accessibility and reassurance to include the practice of attuning atmospheres.
While appropriately designed lighting in public squares can sustain social interaction, lighting also entails negative consequences associated to energy use, light pollution, and a negative impact on ecological systems. Therefore, future research on public spaces should address the spatial distribution of light, also with regard to how energy consumption may be lowered, costs reduced, and obtrusive light avoided. In addition, research to advance knowledge on the influence of spatial as well as spectral characteristics is advocated.
Publiceringsår
2025-03-07
Språk
Engelska
Fulltext
- Available as PDF - 22 MB
- Download statistics
Dokumenttyp
Doktorsavhandling
Förlag
Lund University
Ämne
- Architectural Engineering
Nyckelord
- Light
- Lighting
- Social Interaction
- social sustainability
- Public Spaces
- Public Squares
- Environmental appraisal
- Enviromental psychology
Aktiv
Published
Forskningsgrupp
- Environmental Psychology
Handledare
- Maria Johansson
- Niko Gentile
- Catharina Sternudd
- Pimkamol Mattsson
- Steve Fotios
ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt
- ISBN: 978-91-7740-139-1
- ISBN: 978-91-7740-140-7
Försvarsdatum
2 april 2025
Försvarstid
13:00
Försvarsplats
Lecture Hall A:C, Building A, Klas Anshelms väg 16, Faculty of Engineering LTH, Lund University, Lund.
Opponent
- Femke Beute (Prof.)