Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Integrationskrav i domstol : En studie av hur svenska migrationsdomstolar förhåller sig till nationella politiska ambitioner och övernationella rättskällor

In English

Författare

Summary, in Swedish

Civic integration is an essential part of contemporary migration control regimes. This thesis examines what happens when civic integration policy enters domestic courts, by focusing on how Sweden’s migration courts (which are part of the administrative courts) apply the income and housing requirements for family reunification.The thesis revolves around a common discussion in the legal literature, namely whether Swedish administrative courts have become less preoccupied with pursuing national policy objectives and whether the internationalization of the Swedish legal order has constrained the national legislator’s room for action. By looking at when and how the migration courts refer to and discuss legal sources, it provides a deeper understanding of the relationship between the courts and national political aims. The thesis further evaluates whether the courts’ application corresponds with theories in the legal literature of how Swedish courts have adapted to the internationalization of the Swedish legal order. The main findings are the following. First, the migration courts’ application does not correspond with the above-mentioned theories in the legal literature. Second, the migration courts’ application is in line with the national policy objectives that followed the 2015 ‘refugee crisis’, meaning that the courts seem unwilling to intervene in Swedish migration policy (e.g. by using EU law and ECHR arguments). Lastly, the migrations courts’ application differs from parts of the theories of the function of civic integration that have been put forward in recent years. In these theories, civic integration is partly linked to the prevalence of workfare policy, meaning, inter alia, that self-sufficiency and self-improvement have become key civic virtues. The courts primarily reward non-flexibility in the labour market and hinder attempts at self-improvement, which seems to go against a workfare logic. The thesis further highlights that Sweden’s migration courts reinforce processes of social stratification.

Publiceringsår

2024

Språk

Svenska

Dokumenttyp

Doktorsavhandling

Förlag

Lund University (Media-Tryck)

Ämne

  • Law

Nyckelord

  • Integration
  • Offentlig rätt
  • Förvaltningsrätt
  • Allmän rättslära
  • Migrationsrätt
  • Förrättsligande
  • Familjemigration
  • Familjeåterförening
  • Migrationsdomstol
  • Civic integration
  • Legal theory;
  • Administrative law
  • Jurisprudence
  • Migration law
  • Family migration
  • Judicialization
  • Administrative courts
  • Migration courts

Status

Published

Projekt

  • Hur tänker ni försörja er? En undersökning av migrationsdomstolarnas hantering av kraven vid familjeåterförening

Forskningsgrupp

  • Public Law
  • Integration and Law

Handledare

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISBN: 9789180399913
  • ISBN: 9789180399906

Försvarsdatum

2 maj 2024

Försvarstid

10:15

Försvarsplats

Pufendorfsalen, Lilla Gråbrödersgatan 3 C

Opponent

  • Gregor Noll (Professor)